HOME INSTITUTIONAL INFORMATIONINFORMATION ON DEGREE PROGRAMMES Interior Architecture and Environmental DesignCERTIFICATE PROGRAMMESUSEFUL INFORMATION, RESOURCES & SERVICES FOR STUDENTSUSEFUL LINKS AND DOCUMENTSADITIONAL & SUPPORTING INFORMATION

SECTION I: GENERAL INFORMATION ABOUT THE COURSE

Course Code Course Name Year Semester Theoretical Practical Credit ECTS
60212METOZ-IMC0547 Exhibition Stand Design 4 Fall 1 2 2 4
Course Type : Compulsory
Cycle: Bachelor      TQF-HE:6. Master`s Degree      QF-EHEA:First Cycle      EQF-LLL:6. Master`s Degree
Language of Instruction: Turkish
Prerequisities and Co-requisities: N/A
Mode of Delivery: Face to face
Name of Coordinator: Dr. Öğr. Üyesi BİHTER ERDEM OKUMUŞ
Dersin Öğretim Eleman(lar)ı: Dr. Öğr. Üyesi BİHTER ERDEM OKUMUŞ
RA FEYZA ASLAN
Dersin Kategorisi: Programme Specific

SECTION II: INTRODUCTION TO THE COURSE

Course Objectives & Content

Course Objectives: Students who take this course gain the ability to create innovative and contemporary exhibition element designs by defining the spatial features of the exhibition stands in the fairgrounds according to the principles of design principles.
Course Content: The content of the course includes the principles of designing original and sustainable exhibition spaces by using appropriate materials according to different functions and needs within a limited square meter, considering time and cost limits.

Course Learning Outcomes (CLOs)

Course Learning Outcomes (CLOs) are those describing the knowledge, skills and competencies that students are expected to achieve upon successful completion of the course. In this context, Course Learning Outcomes defined for this course unit are as follows:
Knowledge (Described as Theoritical and/or Factual Knowledge.)
  1) Defines the spatial features of fair stands in fair spaces according to the principles of design principles.
  2) Tells the relationship between material, time and cost in exhibition stand design.
Skills (Describe as Cognitive and/or Practical Skills.)
  1) Analyzes the space within a limited square meter by paying attention to material, time and cost limits.
Competences (Described as "Ability of the learner to apply knowledge and skills autonomously with responsibility", "Learning to learn"," Communication and social" and "Field specific" competences.)
  1) Discovers innovative and contemporary exhibition elements designs according to different functions and needs.
  2) Designs original and sustainable exhibition stands within a limited square meter.

Weekly Course Schedule

Week Subject
Materials Sharing *
Related Preparation Further Study
1) Introduction to Fair Stand Design
2) Overview of the fair design history
3) Structure and examples of fairs in Turkey
4) Discussion of world fair design exhibition formats
5) Examination of technical and carrier systems of fair stands
6) Lighting the exhibition stands and planning the placement of the products
7) Lighting the exhibition stands and planning the placement of the products
8) Midterm
9) Brand determination, corporate identity research and needs analysis
10) Drafts and suggestions of the Fair Stand project
11) Fair stand design process and the place and importance of technology in stand exhibition design
12) Discussion of the exhibition stand design process and innovative design models
13) Evaluation of the Design
14) Process of fair stand design
15) Final Exam
16) Final Exam
*These fields provides students with course materials for their pre- and further study before and after the course delivered.

Recommended or Required Reading & Other Learning Resources/Tools

Course Notes / Textbooks: Siegal, J. (2008), More Mobile: Portable Architecture for Today, New York: Princeton Architectural Press
Urbach, H. (Ed.), Betsky, A., Kronenberg, R., Scoates, C. (2003), Lot-Ek: Mobile Dwelling Unit, Santa Barbara: D.A.P./University Art Museum, University of California
Shaoqiang, W. (2015), New Portable Architecture: Designing Mobile & Temporary Structures, Promotora de Prensa International S. A.
Seonwook, K. & Miyoung, P. (2012), Mobile Architecture (Construction and Design Manual), DOM Publishers
Klanten, R.(Ed.), Ehmann, S.(Ed.), Galindo, M.(Ed.) (2015), The New Nomads: Temporary Spaces and a Life on the Move, Gestalten Publisher
Banham, R. (1970), Theory and design in the first machine age, London:Architectural Press
References: Cook, P., & Archigram (Group). (1999), Archigram, New York: Princeton Architectural Press
Kronenburg, R. (2007), Flexible: Architecture that responds to change, London:Laurence King
Siegal, J. (2002), Mobile: The art of portable architecture, New York: Princeton Architectural Press
Baldwin, J., (1996) Bucky Works: Buckminster Fuller's Ideas for Today, John Wiley&Sons, New York
Brayer, A, M. &Simonot, B. (2002), Archilab’s Future House, London: Thames&Hudson

SECTION III: RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN COURSE UNIT AND COURSE LEARNING OUTCOMES (CLOs)

(The matrix below shows how the course learning outcomes (CLOs) associates with programme learning outcomes (both KPLOs & SPLOs) and, if exist, the level of quantitative contribution to them.)

Relationship Between CLOs & PLOs

(KPLOs and SPLOs are the abbreviations for Key & Sub- Programme Learning Outcomes, respectively. )
CLOs/PLOs KPLO 1 KPLO 2 KPLO 3 KPLO 4 KPLO 5
1 2 3 4 5 1 2 3 4 5 6 1 2 3 1 2 3 4 5 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
CLO1
CLO2
CLO3
CLO4
CLO5

Level of Contribution of the Course to PLOs

No Effect 1 Lowest 2 Low 3 Average 4 High 5 Highest
           
Programme Learning Outcomes Contribution Level (from 1 to 5)
1) Explains the basic, theoretical and practical knowledge about Interior Architecture and Environmental Design. 4
2) Can reveal original and innovative designs. 2
3) Use the drawing programs required by the profession.
4) Apply the theoretical knowledge learned in business life for one semester 3
5) S/he acquires the competencies that develop by the expectations of business world and the society defined as the institutional outcomes of our university on the advanced level in relation with his/her field. 2

SECTION IV: TEACHING-LEARNING & ASSESMENT-EVALUATION METHODS OF THE COURSE

Teaching & Learning Methods of the Course

(All teaching and learning methods used at the university are managed systematically. Upon proposals of the programme units, they are assessed by the relevant academic boards and, if found appropriate, they are included among the university list. Programmes, then, choose the appropriate methods in line with their programme design from this list. Likewise, appropriate methods to be used for the course units can be chosen among those defined for the programme.)
Teaching and Learning Methods defined at the Programme Level
Teaching and Learning Methods Defined for the Course
Lectures
Discussion
Case Study
Problem Solving
Demonstration
Views
Laboratory
Reading
Homework
Project Preparation
Thesis Preparation
Peer Education
Seminar
Technical Visit
Course Conference
Brain Storming
Questions Answers
Individual and Group Work
Role Playing-Animation-Improvisation
Active Participation in Class

Assessment & Evaluation Methods of the Course

(All assessment and evaluation methods used at the university are managed systematically. Upon proposals of the programme units, they are assessed by the relevant academic boards and, if found appropriate, they are included among the university list. Programmes, then, choose the appropriate methods in line with their programme design from this list. Likewise, appropriate methods to be used for the course units can be chosen among those defined for the programme.)
Aassessment and evaluation Methods defined at the Programme Level
Assessment and Evaluation Methods defined for the Course
Midterm
Presentation
Final Exam
Quiz
Report Evaluation
Homework Evaluation
Oral Exam
Thesis Defense
Jury Evaluation
Practice Exam
Evaluation of Implementation Training in the Workplace
Active Participation in Class
Participation in Discussions

Relationship Between CLOs & Teaching-Learning, Assesment-Evaluation Methods of the Course

(The matrix below shows the teaching-learning and assessment-evaluation methods designated for the course unit in relation to the course learning outcomes.)
LEARNING & TEACHING METHODS
COURSE LEARNING OUTCOMES
ASSESMENT & EVALUATION METHODS
CLO1 CLO2 CLO3 CLO4 CLO5
-Lectures -Midterm
-Discussion -Presentation
-Case Study -Final Exam
-Problem Solving -Quiz
-Demonstration -Report Evaluation
-Views -Homework Evaluation
-Laboratory -Oral Exam
-Reading -Thesis Defense
-Homework -Jury Evaluation
-Project Preparation -Practice Exam
-Thesis Preparation -Evaluation of Implementation Training in the Workplace
-Peer Education -Active Participation in Class
-Seminar - Participation in Discussions
-Technical Visit
-Course Conference
-Brain Storming
-Questions Answers
-Individual and Group Work
-Role Playing-Animation-Improvisation
-Active Participation in Class

Contribution of Assesment & Evalution Activities to Final Grade of the Course

Measurement and Evaluation Methods # of practice per semester Level of Contribution
Application 1 % 10.00
Homework Assignments 1 % 10.00
Midterms 1 % 30.00
Semester Final Exam 1 % 50.00
Total % 100
PERCENTAGE OF SEMESTER WORK % 50
PERCENTAGE OF FINAL WORK % 50
Total % 100

SECTION V: WORKLOAD & ECTS CREDITS ALLOCATED FOR THE COURSE

WORKLOAD OF TEACHING & LEARNING ACTIVITIES
Teaching & Learning Activities # of Activities per semester Duration (hour) Total Workload
Course 14 4 56
Laboratory 0 0 0
Application 0 0 0
Special Course Internship (Work Placement) 0 0 0
Field Work 0 0 0
Study Hours Out of Class 0 0 0
Presentations / Seminar 0 0 0
Project 1 16 16
Homework Assignments 1 8 8
Total Workload of Teaching & Learning Activities - - 80
WORKLOAD OF ASSESMENT & EVALUATION ACTIVITIES
Assesment & Evaluation Activities # of Activities per semester Duration (hour) Total Workload
Quizzes 0 0 0
Midterms 1 10 10
Semester Final Exam 1 12 12
Total Workload of Assesment & Evaluation Activities - - 22
TOTAL WORKLOAD (Teaching & Learning + Assesment & Evaluation Activities) 102
ECTS CREDITS OF THE COURSE (Total Workload/25.5 h) 4