HOME INSTITUTIONAL INFORMATIONINFORMATION ON DEGREE PROGRAMMES Interior Architecture and Environmental DesignCERTIFICATE PROGRAMMESUSEFUL INFORMATION, RESOURCES & SERVICES FOR STUDENTSUSEFUL LINKS AND DOCUMENTSADITIONAL & SUPPORTING INFORMATION

SECTION I: GENERAL INFORMATION ABOUT THE COURSE

Course Code Course Name Year Semester Theoretical Practical Credit ECTS
60212METOS-IMC0087 Design for Disadvantaged Individuals 4 Fall 1 2 2 4
Course Type : Non-Departmental Elective
Cycle: Bachelor      TQF-HE:6. Master`s Degree      QF-EHEA:First Cycle      EQF-LLL:6. Master`s Degree
Language of Instruction: Turkish
Prerequisities and Co-requisities: N/A
Mode of Delivery: Face to face
Name of Coordinator: Instructor GÖZDE EZGİ GÖL
Dersin Öğretim Eleman(lar)ı: Profesör Dr. AYŞE NİLAY EVCİL
Instructor EZGİ ALAÇAM BOZTÜRK
Dr. Öğr. Üyesi BİHTER ERDEM OKUMUŞ
Dersin Kategorisi: Field Specific

SECTION II: INTRODUCTION TO THE COURSE

Course Objectives & Content

Course Objectives: The purpose of this course is; To contribute to the creation of barrier-free spaces for disadvantaged individuals and to develop the consciousness necessary for people of all ages to be able to live freely inside and outside spaces within the scope of the concept of universal design.
Course Content: This course; includes solutions, discussions and research on accessible, accessible, inclusive, universal design concepts and principles, legal regulations, assistive technology and accessible design.

Course Specific Rules

Continuing the course will also contribute to the assessment. These points will be added to the passing grade by 10%.

Homework, research and drawings to be prepared must be original and not copied. Submissions that are found to be copies will not be considered.

Course Learning Outcomes (CLOs)

Course Learning Outcomes (CLOs) are those describing the knowledge, skills and competencies that students are expected to achieve upon successful completion of the course. In this context, Course Learning Outcomes defined for this course unit are as follows:
Knowledge (Described as Theoritical and/or Factual Knowledge.)
  1) Knows the individual's disadvantaged status and different human conditions, explains the concept of disability and its types.
  2) Understands the universal and national laws, regulations and various regulations focusing on disadvantaged individuals and defines their historical development.
Skills (Describe as Cognitive and/or Practical Skills.)
  1) Defines design principles and elements for everyone, evaluates by considering the relationship between design and disadvantaged individual.
  2) Manages the planning process for the disadvantaged individual with the technical information received.
Competences (Described as "Ability of the learner to apply knowledge and skills autonomously with responsibility", "Learning to learn"," Communication and social" and "Field specific" competences.)
  1) Interprets and exemplifies the relationship between the wishes of the disadvantaged user and design standards through universal architectural principles in the light of communication and technical information.
  2) Follows and questions universal architectural developments in order to analyze the problems of all individuals.

Weekly Course Schedule

Week Subject
Materials Sharing *
Related Preparation Further Study
1) Course description, content and procedure
2)
3) Accessible, Barrier-Free Design and Inclusive Design (Universal design/Design for All)
4) Legal and design regulations on accessibility
5)
6) The society's perception and awareness of the disabled and the elderly, the importance of the designer's consciousness
7) Access inspector's duties/responsibilities and overall measures of access, space requirement and reach distances
8)
9) Barrier-free design and inclusive design approaches in building entrances, horizontal and vertical circulation elements
10) Barrier-free design and inclusive design approaches in kitchen volumes
11) Barrier-free design and inclusive design approaches in toilets and bathrooms
12) Announcement of the term project and questions and answers about the project
13) Inclusive design requirements in historic buildings/environments: Examining case studies
14)
15)
16)
*These fields provides students with course materials for their pre- and further study before and after the course delivered.

Recommended or Required Reading & Other Learning Resources/Tools

Course Notes / Textbooks: -Şükrü Sürmen (1995), “Özürlü ve Yaşlılar İle İlgili Mimari Ölçüler, Standartlar ve Uygulamalar”, İTÜ Çevre ve Şehircilik Uygulama Araştırma Merkezi
-Dünya Engelliler Vakfı (2011), Herkes için Erişilebilir Şehir Yönetmeliği
-Aslı Sungur Erenoğlu (2013), Mimarlıkta Kapsayıcılık: 'Herkes için Tasarım', YTÜ
-Tasarım ve Özgürlük: Engelli İnsanlar ve Herkes için Tasarım, 2007, TMMOB, Ankara Şubesi, Bülten 46, Dosya 04, Ocak.
References: 1. Evcil, Ayşe Nilay, 2014, Herkes İçin Tasarım Evrensel Tasarım, Boğaziçi Yayınları, İstanbul
2. Edward. S ; Steinfeld,E., Jordana L. Maisel.,2012, Universal design : creating inclusive environments, John Wiley & Sons, USA
3. Holmes-Siedle, J., 1996, Barrier-free design : a manual for building designers and managers , Oxford Butterworth Architecture.
4. Preiser Wolfgang F. E.,Universal Design Handbook, 2011, Second Ed., McGrawHill, Ohio, USA.
5. Sürmen, Şükrü, 2000, Yaşlılar ve Yaşlılık Üzerine Dağınık Notlar, Nüans ArmaYayınları, ISBN:975-7336-19-.
6. Goldsmith, S., 1997, Designing for the disabled : the new paradigm / . Oxford ; Boston : Architectural Press.
7. Erişebilirlik Klavuzu, Aile, Çalışma ve Sosyal Hizmetler Bakanlığı Engelli ve Yaşlı Hizmetleri Genel Müdürlüğü, Ankara,2020 (Bakanlığın internet sitesinden ulaşılabilir)



-Peterson MJ., 1998; Universal kitchen and bathroom planning.
-I. Hacıhasanoğlu (2003), “Evrensel Tasarım”. Tasarım Kuram Dergisi, Mimar Sinan Üniversitesi Yayını, cilt:2, sayı:3, 93-101.
-WHO (Dünya Sağlık Örgütü). 2001. International Classification of Functioning Disability and Health (çev. Kabakçı, E. ve Göğüş, A., İşlevsellik, Yetiyitimi ve Sağlığın Uluslararası Sınıflandırılması: ICF, T.C. Başbakanlık Özürlüler İdaresi Başkanlığı, Ankara, 148 s.)
-Disability Discrimination Act (DDA) (2005)
-Devlet İstatistik Enstitüsü Başkanlığı, Türkiye Özürlüler Araştırması, ISBN 9751935962, Yayın Numarası 2913, Devlet İstatistik Enstitüsü Matbaası, Ankara, 2002

SECTION III: RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN COURSE UNIT AND COURSE LEARNING OUTCOMES (CLOs)

(The matrix below shows how the course learning outcomes (CLOs) associates with programme learning outcomes (both KPLOs & SPLOs) and, if exist, the level of quantitative contribution to them.)

Relationship Between CLOs & PLOs

(KPLOs and SPLOs are the abbreviations for Key & Sub- Programme Learning Outcomes, respectively. )
CLOs/PLOs KPLO 1 KPLO 2 KPLO 3 KPLO 4 KPLO 5
1 2 3 4 5 1 2 3 4 5 6 1 2 3 1 2 3 4 5 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
CLO1
CLO2
CLO3
CLO4
CLO5
CLO6

Level of Contribution of the Course to PLOs

No Effect 1 Lowest 2 Low 3 Average 4 High 5 Highest
           
Programme Learning Outcomes Contribution Level (from 1 to 5)
1) Explains the basic, theoretical and practical knowledge about Interior Architecture and Environmental Design.
2) Can reveal original and innovative designs.
3) Use the drawing programs required by the profession.
4) Apply the theoretical knowledge learned in business life for one semester
5) S/he acquires the competencies that develop by the expectations of business world and the society defined as the institutional outcomes of our university on the advanced level in relation with his/her field.

SECTION IV: TEACHING-LEARNING & ASSESMENT-EVALUATION METHODS OF THE COURSE

Teaching & Learning Methods of the Course

(All teaching and learning methods used at the university are managed systematically. Upon proposals of the programme units, they are assessed by the relevant academic boards and, if found appropriate, they are included among the university list. Programmes, then, choose the appropriate methods in line with their programme design from this list. Likewise, appropriate methods to be used for the course units can be chosen among those defined for the programme.)
Teaching and Learning Methods defined at the Programme Level
Teaching and Learning Methods Defined for the Course
Lectures
Discussion
Case Study
Problem Solving
Demonstration
Views
Laboratory
Reading
Homework
Project Preparation
Thesis Preparation
Peer Education
Seminar
Technical Visit
Course Conference
Brain Storming
Questions Answers
Individual and Group Work
Role Playing-Animation-Improvisation
Active Participation in Class

Assessment & Evaluation Methods of the Course

(All assessment and evaluation methods used at the university are managed systematically. Upon proposals of the programme units, they are assessed by the relevant academic boards and, if found appropriate, they are included among the university list. Programmes, then, choose the appropriate methods in line with their programme design from this list. Likewise, appropriate methods to be used for the course units can be chosen among those defined for the programme.)
Aassessment and evaluation Methods defined at the Programme Level
Assessment and Evaluation Methods defined for the Course
Midterm
Presentation
Final Exam
Quiz
Report Evaluation
Homework Evaluation
Oral Exam
Thesis Defense
Jury Evaluation
Practice Exam
Evaluation of Implementation Training in the Workplace
Active Participation in Class
Participation in Discussions

Relationship Between CLOs & Teaching-Learning, Assesment-Evaluation Methods of the Course

(The matrix below shows the teaching-learning and assessment-evaluation methods designated for the course unit in relation to the course learning outcomes.)
LEARNING & TEACHING METHODS
COURSE LEARNING OUTCOMES
ASSESMENT & EVALUATION METHODS
CLO1 CLO2 CLO3 CLO4 CLO5 CLO6
-Lectures -Midterm
-Discussion -Presentation
-Case Study -Final Exam
-Problem Solving -Quiz
-Demonstration -Report Evaluation
-Views -Homework Evaluation
-Laboratory -Oral Exam
-Reading -Thesis Defense
-Homework -Jury Evaluation
-Project Preparation -Practice Exam
-Thesis Preparation -Evaluation of Implementation Training in the Workplace
-Peer Education -Active Participation in Class
-Seminar - Participation in Discussions
-Technical Visit
-Course Conference
-Brain Storming
-Questions Answers
-Individual and Group Work
-Role Playing-Animation-Improvisation
-Active Participation in Class

Contribution of Assesment & Evalution Activities to Final Grade of the Course

Measurement and Evaluation Methods # of practice per semester Level of Contribution
Homework Assignments 2 % 30.00
Midterms 1 % 20.00
Semester Final Exam 1 % 50.00
Total % 100
PERCENTAGE OF SEMESTER WORK % 50
PERCENTAGE OF FINAL WORK % 50
Total % 100

SECTION V: WORKLOAD & ECTS CREDITS ALLOCATED FOR THE COURSE

WORKLOAD OF TEACHING & LEARNING ACTIVITIES
Teaching & Learning Activities # of Activities per semester Duration (hour) Total Workload
Course 14 2 28
Laboratory 0 0 0
Application 0 0 0
Special Course Internship (Work Placement) 0 0 0
Field Work 2 2 4
Study Hours Out of Class 16 1 16
Presentations / Seminar 2 4 8
Project 1 8 8
Homework Assignments 1 6 6
Total Workload of Teaching & Learning Activities - - 70
WORKLOAD OF ASSESMENT & EVALUATION ACTIVITIES
Assesment & Evaluation Activities # of Activities per semester Duration (hour) Total Workload
Quizzes 2 4 8
Midterms 1 6 6
Semester Final Exam 1 8 8
Total Workload of Assesment & Evaluation Activities - - 22
TOTAL WORKLOAD (Teaching & Learning + Assesment & Evaluation Activities) 92
ECTS CREDITS OF THE COURSE (Total Workload/25.5 h) 4