SECTION I: GENERAL INFORMATION ABOUT THE COURSE

Course Code	Course Name	Year	Semester	Theoretical	Practical	Credit	ECTS
60314YEEOS-SOC2245	Active Citizenship and Participation	1	Spring	2	0	2	3

Course Type :	University Elective
Cycle:	Bachelor      TQF-HE:6. Master`s Degree      QF-EHEA:First Cycle      EQF-LLL:6. Master`s Degree
Language of Instruction:	English
Prerequisities and Co-requisities:	N/A
Mode of Delivery:	E-Learning
Name of Coordinator:	Dr. Öğr. Üyesi TUBA DEMİRCİ
Dersin Öğretim Eleman(lar)ı:	Dr. Öğr. Üyesi TUBA DEMİRCİ
Dersin Kategorisi:	Competency Development (University Elective)

SECTION II: INTRODUCTION TO THE COURSE

Course Objectives & Content

Course Objectives:	This course aims to introduce the concept of citizenship, citizenship theories and the mechanisms of active citizen participation. Within the scope of this course; the concept; development; theoretical approaches to citizenship as well as the processes of acquiring and losing it; citizenship in Turkey and the mechanisms of active citizen participation will be discussed.
Course Content:	Within the scope of this course; the concept of citizenship, development of citizenship, theories of citizenship, how to gain and loose citizenship, citizenship in Turkey and the mechanisms of active citizen participation will be discused.

Course Specific Rules

Reading Assignments: If the course is to be genuinely exploratory, it is vital that everyone participates and reads widely. Students are required to read all assigned readings prior to coming to the class. Overall speaking, to be able to prompt and successful for the exams, all readings have to be done on regular basis. Course readings are available as PDF COPIES AS MENTIONED ABOVE. Students are expected to read/watch/listen whatever the weekly assignments. Additional sources might be assigned throughout the semester. Communication &Contact: Please note that I am not able to respond constantly to instant e-mails and questions after working hours, during weekends and bank holidays. Do not expect me to respond promptly to the last minute inquiries especially just before exams. Please note that this syllabus is a contract between you and the course professor, and you are liable for the requirements listed above. Course instructor has the right to make revisions and changes on this syllabus when necessary such as assigning additional readings or activities. Take the directions regarding office hours on the front page as reference; except office hours or pre-arranged appointments by mail, I am not supposed see any student. I do not want any of you to be loitering in front of my office door except office hours since faculty area is an extremely busy one. Classroom courtesy: It is not appropriate to verbally attack or insult another person in this class, or to use derogatory language. We will be discussing material that many of you may have differing opinions about. Your opinions will be more effectively communicated if you refrain from using inflammatory language and instead ground your argument in academic discourse and scholarship. If you are disrupting the class with any of these or any other behaviour, I will ask you to leave. In turn, I will help create a positive, friendly environment in which you should feel comfortable asking questions. Circulation of Course Materials: DO NOT reproduce course materials or share/post them on‐line or anywhere else. They are copyrighted materials. This includes the syllabus, lecture slides, notes, exams where applicable. As a student in the course, you will have access to everything you need via OİS/Online Beykoz.

Course Learning Outcomes (CLOs)

Course Learning Outcomes (CLOs) are those describing the knowledge, skills and competencies that students are expected to achieve upon successful completion of the course. In this context, Course Learning Outcomes defined for this course unit are as follows:

Knowledge (Described as Theoritical and/or Factual Knowledge.)

1) Learns the development of citizenship as a concept,

2) Learns the development of citizenship in Turkey

3) Learns and comprehends mechanisms of active citizen participation

Skills (Describe as Cognitive and/or Practical Skills.)

Competences (Described as "Ability of the learner to apply knowledge and skills autonomously with responsibility", "Learning to learn"," Communication and social" and "Field specific" competences.)

Weekly Course Schedule

Week	Subject	Materials Sharing *
		Related Preparation	Further Study
1)	Introduction: Course Means & Aims ; Defining Citizenship and Active Citizenship	Bellamy, R. (2008). Citizenship: A Very Short Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1-27. *Kadıoğlu, A. (2012) “Vatandaşlık: Kavramın Farklı Anlamları” Vatandaşlığın Dönüşümü: Üyelikten Haklara içinde (der.) Kadıoğlu, A. İstanbul: Metis, 21-31.
2)	Evolution of the Concept of Citizenship	Bellamy, R. (2008). Citizenship: A Very Short Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 27-52. Burchell, D. (2003). “Ancient Citizenship and Its Inheritors” in Handbook of Citizenship Studies. (eds.) Isin, E. F. and Turner, B. S. London: Sage, 89-104. *Brubaker, W. R. (2012) “Fransa ve Almanya’da Göç, Vatandaşlık ve Ulus-Devlet: Karşılaştırmalı Bir Tarihsel Çözümleme” Vatandaşlığın Dönüşümü: Üyelikten Haklara içinde (der.) Kadıoğlu, A. İstanbul: Metis, 55-92. *Marshall, T. H. (2013) “Yurttaşlık ve Sosyal Sınıf”. Sosyal Politika Yazıları içinde (der.) Buğra, A. ve Keyder, Ç. İstanbul: İletişim Yayınları, 19-32.
3)	Concepts about Citizenship	Bellamy, R. (2008). Citizenship: A Very Short Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 78-97. Janoski, T. and Gran, B. (2003) “Political Citizenship: Foundations of Rights” in Handbook of Citizenship Studies. (eds.) Isin, E. F. and Turner, B. S. London: Sage, 13-52.
4)	Citizenship Theories-1	Bellamy, R. (2008). Citizenship: A Very Short Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 52-78. Dagger, R. (2003). “Republican Citizenship” in Handbook of Citizenship Studies. (eds.) Isin, E. F. and Turner, B. S. London: Sage, 145-157. Delanty, G. (2003). “Communitarianism and Citizenship” in Handbook of Citizenship Studies. (eds.) Isin, E. F. and Turner, B. S. London: Sage, 159-174. Schuck, P. H. (2003). “Liberal Citizenship” in Handbook of Citizenship Studies. (eds.) Isin, E. F. and Turner, B. S. London: Sage, 131-144. *Kadirbeyoğlu, Z. and Sümer, B. (2018). “Ulus-Devletlerde Vatandaşlık ve Kimlik” Küresel Siyasete Giriş: Uluslararası İlişkilerde Kavramlar, Teoriler, Süreçler içinde (der.) Balta, E. İstanbul: İletişim Yayınları, 491-505. *Turner, B. S. (2012) “Bir Vatandaşlık Kuramının Anahatları” Vatandaşlığın Dönüşümü: Üyelikten Haklara içinde(der.) Kadıoğlu, A. İstanbul: Metis, 107-139.
5)	Citizenship Theories-2	Rasmussen, C. and Brown, M. (2003). “Radical Democratic Citizenship: Amidst Political Theory and Geography” in Handbook of Citizenship Studies. (eds.) Isin, E. F. and Turner, B. S. London: Sage, 175-188. Joppke, C. (2003). “Multicultural Citizenship” in Handbook of Citizenship Studies. (eds.) Isin, E. F. and Turner, B. S. London: Sage, 245-258. Linklater, A. (2003). “Cosmopolitan Citizenship” in Handbook of Citizenship Studies. (eds.) Isin, E. F. and Turner, B. S. London: Sage, 317-332. Sassen, S. (2003). “Towards Post-National and Denationalized Citizenship” in Handbook of Citizenship Studies. (eds.) Isin, E. F. and Turner, B. S. London: Sage, 277-291.
6)	Acquiring and Losing Citizenship	Kivisto, P. and Faist, T. (2007). Citizenship: Discourse, Theory, and Transnational Prospects. Victoria: Blackwell, 102-130.
7)	Discrimination and Exclusion	Hepworth, K. () “Topologies of Citizenship” in Routledge Handbook of Global Citizenship Studies (eds.) Isin, E. F. and Nyers, P. New York: Routledge, 110-118. Prechel, H. and Berkowitz, L. (2020). “Conflict Theories in Political Sociology: Class, Power, Inequality and the Historical Transition to Financialization” in The New Handbook of Political Sociology (eds.) Janoski, T.; de Leon, C.; Misra, J. and Martin, I. W. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, 53-79. Bloemraad, I. and Hamlin, R. (2020). “Migration, Asylum, Integration and Citizenship Policy” in The New Handbook of Political Sociology (eds.) Janoski, T.; de Leon, C.; Misra, J. and Martin, I. W. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, 880-909. Dean, J. (2012) “Gender, Power, Politics” in The Wiley-Blackwell Companion to Political Sociology (eds.) Amenta, E.; Nash, K. and Scott, A. Blackwell Publishing, 283-294. Savage, M. (2012) “Class, Culture and Politics” in The Wiley-Blackwell Companion to Political Sociology (eds.) Amenta, E.; Nash, K. and Scott, A. Blackwell Publishing, 294-305. Norval, A. J. (2012) “The Politics of Ethnicity and Identity” in The Wiley-Blackwell Companion to Political Sociology (eds.) Amenta, E.; Nash, K. and Scott, A. Blackwell Publishing, 305-315. Skrentny, J. D. and Patnode, R. (2012) “Race and Politics” in The Wiley-Blackwell Companion to Political Sociology (eds.) Amenta, E.; Nash, K. and Scott, A. Blackwell Publishing, 315-325. Feagin, J. R. and Elias, S. (2020). “Theories of Race, Ethnicity, and the Racial State” in The New Handbook of Political Sociology (eds.) Janoski, T.; de Leon, C.; Misra, J. and Martin, I. W. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, 191-216. Lister, R. (2012) “Citizenship and Gender” in The Wiley-Blackwell Companion to Political Sociology (eds.) Amenta, E.; Nash, K. and Scott, A. Blackwell Publishing, 372-383. *Fundamental Rights Agency (2018). Handbook on European Non-discrimination Law https://fra.europa.eu/en/publication/2018/handbook-european-non-discrimination-law-2018-edition *Ayrımcılığa Karşı (2021). Ayrımcılık Yasağı, Başvuru Mekanizmaları ve Ayrımcılığın İzlenmesi Rehberi. https://twitter.com/ayrimciligakars/status/1376567270110019585
8)	MIDTERM WEEK- EXAM DATE WILL BE ANNOUNCED LATER	-
9)	BANK HOLIDAY – DAY OF NATIONAL SOVEREIGNITY 23 April 2022
10)	Citizenship in Turkey	Arat, Y. (2005) “Women’s Challenge to Citizenship in Turkey” in Citizenship and the Nation-State in Greece and Turkey (eds.) Birtek, F. and Dragonas, T. New York: Routledge: 104-116. Birtek, F. (2008). ”Aydınlanma, Vatandaşlık ve Siyasi Rejimler” Türkiye'de Çokkültürlü Anayasal Vatandaşlık içinde (der.) Keyman, F. İstanbul: Osmanlı Bankası Arşiv ve Araştırma Merkezi, 18-27. İnce, B. (2012). Citizenship and Identity in Turkey: From Atatürk’s Republic to the Present Day. London: IB Tauris, 19-183. Kadıoğlu, A. (2012) ”Vatandaşlığın Ulustan Arındırılması: Türkiye Örneği” Vatandaşlığın Dönüşümü: Üyelikten Haklara içinde (der.) Kadıoğlu, A. İstanbul: Metis, 31-54. Kadıoğlu, A. (2012) ”Türkiye’de Vatandaşlığın Anatomisi” Vatandaşlığın Dönüşümü: Üyelikten Haklara içinde (der.) Kadıoğlu, A. İstanbul: Metis, 166-184. Keyman, F. (2008). ”Önsöz: Kimlik, Vatandaşlık ve Demokratikleşme Türkiye Örneği” Türkiye'de Çokkültürlü Anayasal Vatandaşlık içinde (der.) Keyman, F. İstanbul: Osmanlı Bankası Arşiv ve Araştırma Merkezi, 7-12. Keyman, F. (2012) ”Türkiye’de Çokkültürlü Anayasal Vatandaşlık” Vatandaşlığın Dönüşümü: Üyelikten Haklara içinde (der.) Kadıoğlu, A. İstanbul: Metis, 218-245. Koğacıoğlu, D. (2005). ”Citizenship in Context: Rethinking Women’s Relationships to Law in Turkey” ” in Citizenship and the Nation-State in Greece and Turkey (eds.) Birtek, F. and Dragonas, T. New York: Routledge: 144-160. Soyarık Şentürk, N. (2008). ”Türkiye’de Vatandaşlık: Anayasal ve Yasal Düzenlemeler Işığında Bir İnceleme” Türkiye'de Çokkültürlü Anayasal Vatandaşlık içinde (der.) Keyman, F. İstanbul: Osmanlı Bankası Arşiv ve Araştırma Merkezi, 27-38. Vatandaşlık Araştırması. https://konda.com.tr/wp-content/uploads/2017/02/2016_03_VatandaslikArastirmasi.pdf
11)	Participation	Bellamy, R. (2008). Citizenship: A Very Short Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 97-124. Türkiye’de Gençlerin Katılımı. https://vimeo.com/97060593
12)	Political Participation	Erdoğan, E. & Uyan-Semerci, P. (2016). “Understanding Young Citizens’ Political Participation in Turkey: Does ‘Being Young’ Matter?”, Southeast European and Black Sea Studies. TESEV (2016). Kadınlar İçin Yerel bir Katılım Aracı Olarak Eşitlik Birimleri. TESEV (2016). Sürdürülebilir Kentler Yerel Müşterekler Siyaseti İçin E-Katılım. TESEV (2019). Üst Düzey Karar Almada Kadın Katılımı.
13)	Civil Society	Ray, L. (2012) “Civil Society and the Public Sphere” in The Wiley-Blackwell Companion to Political Sociology (eds.) Amenta, E.; Nash, K. and Scott, A. Blackwell Publishing, 240-251. Drake, M. S. (2010). Political Sociology for a Globalizing World. Polity Press: Cambridge, 116-134. Erdoğan, E., Uyan-Semerci, P., Yentürk, N. & Yurttagüler, L. (2020). Türkiye'de Gönüllülük: Deneyimler, Sınırlılıklar ve Yeni Açılımlar. İstanbul Bilgi Üniversitesi Yayınları. İstanbul Bilgi Üniversitesi (2010). Savunuculuk ve Politikaları Etkileme. İstanbul Bilgi Üniversitesi (2006). Gönüllülerle İşbirliği. Keyman, F. (2006). Türkiye'de Sivil Toplumun Serüveni: İmkansızlıklar İçinde Bir Vaha. Ankara: STGM. TESEV (2020). Yerel Yönetimlerde Stratejik Plan İzleme ve Değerlendirmesine Sivil Toplum Katılımı Rehberi. TESEV (2020). Demokratik Kentsel Yönetişimde Güçlenen Sivil Toplum ve Etkin İş Birlikleri. TÜSEV (2015). Sivil Topluma Aktif Katılım: Uluslararası Standartlar, Ulusal Mevzuattaki Engeller, Öneriler.
14)	Social Movements	Bakan, R. ve Kadirbeyoğlu, Z. (2020) ”Küresel Sermaye, Yerel Direnişler: Ekolojik Hareketlerde Kadınların Vatandaşlık Talebi” Doğa ve Kadın: Ekolojik Dönüşümde Feminist Tartışmalar içinde (der.) Değirmenci, E., 73-85. Çayır, K. (1999). "Toplumsal Sahnenin Yeni Aktörleri: Yeni Sosyal Hareketler". Yeni Sosyal Hareketler içinde (yay.haz.) Çayır, K. Kaktüs Yayınları: İstanbul, 13-32. Çetinkaya, D. Y. (2018). ”Toplumsal Hareketler”. Toplumsal Hareketler: Tarih, Teori ve Deneyim içinde (der.)Çetinkaya, D. Y. İstanbul: İletişim, 481-485. Curtin, D. (2003). “Ecological Citizenship” in Handbook of Citizenship Studies. (eds.) Isin, E. F. and Turner, B. S. London: Sage, 293-304. Drake, M. S. (2010). Political Sociology for a Globalizing World. Polity Press: Cambridge, 134-156. Edelman, M. (2012) “Rural Social Movements” in The Wiley-Blackwell Companion to Political Sociology (eds.) Amenta, E.; Nash, K. and Scott, A. Blackwell Publishing, 431-444. Ekoloji Kolektifi (2016). "Yerel Ekoloji Hareketleri ve Yurttaşlık Hakları: Algı, Bilgi ve Mücadele Olasılıkları". Evans, P. (2020). “Transnational Social Movements” in The New Handbook of Political Sociology (eds.) Janoski, T.; de Leon, C.; Misra, J. and Martin, I. W. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, 1053-1078. Gottdiener, M. (2015) ”Castells’in Düşüncesinde Kentsel Toplumsal Hareketlerin Yeri” Kamusal Alan içinde (der.)Özbek, M. İstanbul: Hil Yayın, 429-439. Jasper, M. (2020). “Social Movements” in The New Handbook of Political Sociology (eds.) Janoski, T.; de Leon, C.; Misra, J. and Martin, I. W. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, 627-646. Meyer, D. S. (2012) “Protests and Political Process” in The Wiley-Blackwell Companion to Political Sociology (eds.) Amenta, E.; Nash, K. and Scott, A. Blackwell Publishing, 397-408. Moghadan, V. M. (2012) “Global Social Movements and Transnational Advocacy” in The Wiley-Blackwell Companion to Political Sociology (eds.) Amenta, E.; Nash, K. and Scott, A. Blackwell Publishing, 408-421. Topal Demiroğlu, E. (2014). "Yeni Toplumsal Hareketler: Bir Literatür Taraması". Marmara Üniversitesi Siyasal Bilimler Dergisi 2:1, 133-144. Turhan, E., Özlüer, F. ve Gündoğan, A. C. (2016). "Türkiye'de Ekoloji Mücadelesi: Sınıfsal ve Tarihsel Arayüzler Arasında Nereden Nereye?" İsyanın ve Umudun Dip Dalgası içinde (der.) Erensü, S., Turhan, E., Özlüer, F. ve Gündoğan, A. C. İstanbul: Tekin Yayınevi, 15-39.
15)	Media and Social Media	Media and Social Media
16)	Final exam

*These fields provides students with course materials for their pre- and further study before and after the course delivered.

Recommended or Required Reading & Other Learning Resources/Tools

Course Notes / Textbooks:

References:

Bellamy, R. (2008). Citizenship: A Very Short Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Handbook of Citizenship Studies. (eds.) Isin, E. F. and Turner, B. S. London: Sage, 2003. Kivisto, P. and Faist, T. (2007). Citizenship: Discourse, Theory, and Transnational Prospects. Victoria: Blackwell Routledge Handbook of Global Citizenship Studies (eds.) Isin, E. F. and Nyers, P. New York: Routledge, 2014. The New Handbook of Political Sociology (eds.) Janoski, T.; de Leon, C.; Misra, J. and Martin, I. W. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, 2020 The Wiley-Blackwell Companion to Political Sociology (eds.) Amenta, E.; Nash, K. and Scott, A. Blackwell Publishing, 2012. Citizenship and the Nation-State in Greece and Turkey (eds.) Birtek, F. and Dragonas, T. New York: Routledge, 2005. Türkiye'de Çokkültürlü Anayasal Vatandaşlık içinde (der.) Keyman, F. İstanbul: Osmanlı Bankası Arşiv ve Araştırma Merkezi, 2008. Vatandaşlığın Dönüşümü: Üyelikten Haklara içinde (der.) Kadıoğlu, A. İstanbul: Metis, 2012. Doğa ve Kadın: Ekolojik Dönüşümde Feminist Tartışmalar içinde (der.) Değirmenci, E. 2020. Yeni Sosyal Hareketler içinde (yay.haz.) Çayır, K. Kaktüs Yayınları: İstanbul, 1999. Toplumsal Hareketler: Tarih, Teori ve Deneyim içinde (der.)Çetinkaya, D. Y. İstanbul: İletişim, 2018.

SECTION III: RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN COURSE UNIT AND COURSE LEARNING OUTCOMES (CLOs)

(The matrix below shows how the course learning outcomes (CLOs) associates with programme learning outcomes (both KPLOs & SPLOs) and, if exist, the level of quantitative contribution to them.)

Relationship Between CLOs & PLOs

(KPLOs and SPLOs are the abbreviations for Key & Sub- Programme Learning Outcomes, respectively. )

CLOs/PLOs	KPLO 1	KPLO 2				KPLO 3										KPLO 4				KPLO 5
	1	1	2	3	4	1	2	3	4	5	6	7	8	9	10	1	2	3	4	1	2	3	4	5	6	7	8	9	10	11	12
CLO1
CLO2
CLO3

Level of Contribution of the Course to PLOs

No Effect	1 Lowest	2 Low	3 Average	4 High	5 Highest

	Programme Learning Outcomes	Contribution Level (from 1 to 5)
1)	Uses and applies theoretical and applied sciences in the field of basic science subjects for the solution of computer engineering problems.
	1.1 Has sufficient knowledge in mathematics, science, computer science and computer engineering; use theoretical and applied knowledge in these fields together to solve computer engineering problems
2)	Analyzes computer engineering applications, designs and develops models to meet specific requirements under realistic constraints and conditions. For this purpose, selects and uses appropriate methods, tools and technologies.
	2.1 Identify, define, formulate and solve complex computer engineering problems; for this purpose select and apply appropriate analytical and modeling methods
	2.2 Designs a complex computer and software based system, process, device or product to meet certain requirements under realistic constraints and conditions, including economics, environmental issues, sustainability, manufacturability, ethics, health, safety, social and political issues; For this purpose, it applies modern design methods.
	2.3 Selects and effectively uses modern techniques and tools and information technologies required for computer science and computer engineering applications.
	2.4 Designs and conducts experiments, collects data, analyzes and interprets the results for the study of computer science and computer engineering problems and research topics.
3)	Owns the competencies required by the constantly developing field of computer engineering and the global competitive environment.
	3.1 Works effectively individually and in multi-disciplinary teams, takes responsibility.
	3.2 Accesses the information and for this purpose searches for resources, uses databases and other information resources.
	3.3 Awares of the necessity of lifelong learning, follows developments in science and technology and renews itself continuously.
	3.4 Communicates effectively in Turkish, both orally and in writing, has at least one foreign language knowledge at the level of European Language Portfolio B1.
	3.5 Manage projects, has conscious of workplace practices, employee health, environmental and work safety; aware of the legal consequences of engineering applications.
	3.6 Has awareness of the universal and social effects of engineering solutions and applications; has awareness of entrepreneurship and innovativeness and knowledgeable about contemporary issues.
	3.7 Has professional and ethical responsibility.
	3.8 Has information about the standards used in computer engineering applications.
	3.9 Has quality consciousness.
	3.10 Has the capacity to work in at least one of the important application areas of computer science and computer engineering.
4)	Applies the theoretical knowledge in business life during a semester.
	4.1 Experiences all processes in business life.
	4.2 Takes part in activities related to the field of education in a business operating in the field.
	4.3 Questions the application with theoretical knowledge.
	4.4 Compiles the knowledge and experience gained in the field.
5)	S/he acquires the competencies that develop by the expectations of business world and the society defined as the institutional outcomes of our university on the advanced level in relation with his/her field.
	5.1 Acquires the analyzing solving the problems and managing the conflicts.
	5.2 Participates as a team member and takes responsibility in the environments that require the solving of the conflicts and acts as a leader when necessary.
	5.3 Has awareness for ethical and social responsivity.
	5.4 By supporting the learnt courses with quantitative and qualitative data; and by using verbal and visual communication means, s/he transfers them to the groups within and outside his/her group in a systematical and effective way.
	5.5 Evaluates the norms and standards present in the works in which s/he takes responsibility in a critical point of view.
	5.6 Develops strategical, innovative and entrepreneurial ideas.
	5.7 Acquires competence of managing the change.
	5.8 Shows development personally and socially with and awareness for lifelong learning.
	5.9 Follows advanced technologies and developments about digital transformation.
	5.10 Has cultural awareness and s/he transfers this to the groups within and outside his/her field.
	5.11 Has awareness about citizenship competency.
	5.12 Acquires communication in a Foreign Language (English) competence defined on the level of at least B1 in European Language Portfolio. (In programs whose medium of instruction is English, on the level of B2/B2+).

SECTION IV: TEACHING-LEARNING & ASSESMENT-EVALUATION METHODS OF THE COURSE

Teaching & Learning Methods of the Course

(All teaching and learning methods used at the university are managed systematically. Upon proposals of the programme units, they are assessed by the relevant academic boards and, if found appropriate, they are included among the university list. Programmes, then, choose the appropriate methods in line with their programme design from this list. Likewise, appropriate methods to be used for the course units can be chosen among those defined for the programme.)

Teaching and Learning Methods defined at the Programme Level	Teaching and Learning Methods Defined for the Course
Lectures
Discussion
Case Study
Problem Solving
Demonstration
Views
Laboratory
Reading
Homework
Project Preparation
Thesis Preparation
Peer Education
Seminar
Technical Visit
Course Conference
Brain Storming
Questions Answers
Individual and Group Work
Role Playing-Animation-Improvisation
Active Participation in Class

Assessment & Evaluation Methods of the Course

(All assessment and evaluation methods used at the university are managed systematically. Upon proposals of the programme units, they are assessed by the relevant academic boards and, if found appropriate, they are included among the university list. Programmes, then, choose the appropriate methods in line with their programme design from this list. Likewise, appropriate methods to be used for the course units can be chosen among those defined for the programme.)

Aassessment and evaluation Methods defined at the Programme Level	Assessment and Evaluation Methods defined for the Course
Midterm
Presentation
Final Exam
Quiz
Report Evaluation
Homework Evaluation
Oral Exam
Thesis Defense
Jury Evaluation
Practice Exam
Evaluation of Implementation Training in the Workplace
Active Participation in Class
Participation in Discussions

Relationship Between CLOs & Teaching-Learning, Assesment-Evaluation Methods of the Course

(The matrix below shows the teaching-learning and assessment-evaluation methods designated for the course unit in relation to the course learning outcomes.)

Contribution of Assesment & Evalution Activities to Final Grade of the Course

Measurement and Evaluation Methods	# of practice per semester	Level of Contribution
Quizzes	2	% 20.00
Midterms	1	% 30.00
Semester Final Exam	1	% 50.00
Total		% 100
PERCENTAGE OF SEMESTER WORK		% 50
PERCENTAGE OF FINAL WORK		% 50
Total		% 100

SECTION V: WORKLOAD & ECTS CREDITS ALLOCATED FOR THE COURSE