SECTION I: GENERAL INFORMATION ABOUT THE COURSE

Course Code	Course Name	Year	Semester	Theoretical	Practical	Credit	ECTS
60212METOZ-IMC0455	Ergonomics	3	Fall	1	2	2	3

Course Type :	Compulsory
Cycle:	Bachelor      TQF-HE:6. Master`s Degree      QF-EHEA:First Cycle      EQF-LLL:6. Master`s Degree
Language of Instruction:	Turkish
Prerequisities and Co-requisities:	N/A
Mode of Delivery:	E-Learning
Name of Coordinator:	Dr. Öğr. Üyesi BİHTER ERDEM OKUMUŞ
Dersin Öğretim Eleman(lar)ı:	Profesör Dr. ÖZKAL BARIŞ ÖZTÜRK
Dersin Kategorisi:	Programme Specific

SECTION II: INTRODUCTION TO THE COURSE

Course Objectives & Content

Course Objectives:

The student who takes this course establishes the objective and operational relationship between the physical environment and human. Analyzes how the static and dynamic user will come into contact with the space and the object. It analyzes the full-empty bond in the space in a healthy way. Dimensions the human-space relationship in the context of functional requirements.

Course Content:

The content of this course includes the meaning, importance and scope of ergonomics, the concept of anthropometry, basic Static Anthropometry and object-human relations, Dynamic Anthropometry and action-environment relations, living spaces in dwelling; kitchen and bathroom ergonomics, living and drinking areas ergonomics, spatial connections, ergonomics of attachments and jewelry, ergonomics of office and restaurant spaces, universal design principles and cognitive ergonomics.

Course Learning Outcomes (CLOs)

Course Learning Outcomes (CLOs) are those describing the knowledge, skills and competencies that students are expected to achieve upon successful completion of the course. In this context, Course Learning Outcomes defined for this course unit are as follows:

Knowledge (Described as Theoritical and/or Factual Knowledge.)

1) Defines the objective bases of the space-human-action relationship.

2) Explain the nature of spatial interventions in the context of measure-dimension-form.

Skills (Describe as Cognitive and/or Practical Skills.)

1) Designs and implements the full-empty balance of space.

2) Analyzes and constructs the body-space connection.

3) Examines, interprets and applies the body-object theme.

Competences (Described as "Ability of the learner to apply knowledge and skills autonomously with responsibility", "Learning to learn"," Communication and social" and "Field specific" competences.)

1) Establishes a connection between theory and practice.

2) Designs spaces and objects compatible with anthropometric values.

Weekly Course Schedule

Week	Subject	Materials Sharing *
		Related Preparation	Further Study
1)	Introduction to course content and introduction to Anthropometry
2)	Static Anthropometry and Dynamic Anthropometry
3)	Ergonomics in the kitchen
4)	Ergonomics in the kitchen space / application
5)	Ergonomics in the bathroom
6)	Ergonomics in the bathroom/application
7)	Ergonomics in residential living space
8)	Midterm
9)	Ergonomics in residential living space/application
10)	Spatial connections, inserts and affix ergonomics
11)	Spatial connections, inserts and affix ergonomics/application
12)	Ergonomics in office and food and beverage areas
13)	Ergonomics in office and food and beverage areas/application
14)	Universal design concept and principles
15)	Final Exam
16)	Final Exam

*These fields provides students with course materials for their pre- and further study before and after the course delivered.

Recommended or Required Reading & Other Learning Resources/Tools

Course Notes / Textbooks:	Boduroğlu, Ş. (2005) Konutlarda Evrensel Tasarım Kavramı ve Örnekler Üzerinde Analizi ● Küçükerman, Ö., (1978) Kişi-Çevre İlişkilerinde Çağdaş Gelişimler ve Oturma Eylemi, İDGSA, İstanbul. ● Toka, C.(1978) “İnsan - Araç Bağlantısında Ergonomik Tasarım İlkeleri”, İ.D.G.S.A. İstanbul.
References:	● Albayrak, N. (2011) Ergonominin Anatomi Fizyoloji ve Psikoloji İle İlişkisi. ● Croney, J. (1980) Antropometry For Designers. ● Grandjean, E., (1973) “Ergonomics of The Home”, Francis and Taylor, London. ● Panero. J. ve Zelnik, M. (1979) Human Dimension & İnterior Space: A Source Book of Design Reference Standards, Watson-Guptill Publications, New York.

SECTION III: RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN COURSE UNIT AND COURSE LEARNING OUTCOMES (CLOs)

(The matrix below shows how the course learning outcomes (CLOs) associates with programme learning outcomes (both KPLOs & SPLOs) and, if exist, the level of quantitative contribution to them.)

Relationship Between CLOs & PLOs

(KPLOs and SPLOs are the abbreviations for Key & Sub- Programme Learning Outcomes, respectively. )

CLOs/PLOs	KPLO 1					KPLO 2						KPLO 3			KPLO 4					KPLO 5
	1	2	3	4	5	1	2	3	4	5	6	1	2	3	1	2	3	4	5	1	2	3	4	5	6	7	8	9	10	11	12
CLO1
CLO2
CLO3
CLO4
CLO5
CLO6
CLO7

Level of Contribution of the Course to PLOs

No Effect	1 Lowest	2 Low	3 Average	4 High	5 Highest

	Programme Learning Outcomes	Contribution Level (from 1 to 5)
1)	Explains the basic, theoretical and practical knowledge about Interior Architecture and Environmental Design.	5
	1.1 To have knowledge about national and international laws, regulations and universal design principles.	5
	1.2 Explain the historical development of architecture.
	1.3 Summarizes all development processes of design.
	1.4 Summarizes all the development processes of furniture history.
	1.5 Defines the historical development process of art.
2)	Can reveal original and innovative designs.	3
	2.1 Transfers the bill or idea in her/his mind to paper	3
	2.2 Defines and applies design principles and elements.	4
	2.3 Manages the space planning process in the light of technical knowledge in the field of design.	3
	2.4 Apply the acquired theoretical knowledge in design techniques.
	2.5 Designs the furniture and its combination details and manages the furniture production process.	5
	2.6 Designs by considering the anatomical, anthropometric features, psychological, physical capacity and tolerances of the user.	5
3)	Use the drawing programs required by the profession.
	3.1 Be able to use Autocad program effectively in technical drawing language.
	3.2 He/she capable of using 3Ds Max program as presentation technique in modeling.
	3.3 Can use the necessary presentation programs actively when transferring information to the relevant people.
4)	Apply the theoretical knowledge learned in business life for one semester	2
	4.1 To be able to organize and implement projects and activities for the social environment in which they live with a sense of social responsibility.
	4.2 Transfers the professional knowledge to individuals and institutions orally and in writing.
	4.3 To be able to manage activities for the development of employees working under their responsibility.
	4.4 Explain problems using professional data.	2
	4.5 Solves the complex problems encountered and unforeseen in applications.	2
5)	S/he acquires the competencies that develop by the expectations of business world and the society defined as the institutional outcomes of our university on the advanced level in relation with his/her field.
	5.1 Acquires the analyzing solving the problems and managing the conflicts.
	5.2 Participates as a team member and takes responsibility in the environments that require the solving of the conflicts and acts as a leader when necessary.
	5.3 Has awareness for ethical and social responsivity.
	5.4 By supporting the learnt courses with quantitative and qualitative data; and by using verbal and visual communication means, s/he transfers them to the groups within and outside his/her group in a systematical and effective way.
	5.5 Evaluates the norms and standards present in the works in which s/he takes responsibility in a critical point of view.
	5.6 Develops strategical, innovative and entrepreneurial ideas.
	5.7 Acquires competence of managing the change.
	5.8 Shows development personally and socially with and awareness for lifelong learning.
	5.9 Follows advanced technologies and developments about digital transformation.
	5.10 Has cultural awareness and s/he transfers this to the groups within and outside his/her field.
	5.11 Has awareness about citizenship competency.
	5.12 Acquires communication in a Foreign Language (English) competence defined on the level of at least B1 in European Language Portfolio. (In programs whose medium of instruction is English, on the level of B2/B2+).

SECTION IV: TEACHING-LEARNING & ASSESMENT-EVALUATION METHODS OF THE COURSE

Teaching & Learning Methods of the Course

(All teaching and learning methods used at the university are managed systematically. Upon proposals of the programme units, they are assessed by the relevant academic boards and, if found appropriate, they are included among the university list. Programmes, then, choose the appropriate methods in line with their programme design from this list. Likewise, appropriate methods to be used for the course units can be chosen among those defined for the programme.)

Teaching and Learning Methods defined at the Programme Level	Teaching and Learning Methods Defined for the Course
Lectures
Discussion
Case Study
Problem Solving
Demonstration
Views
Laboratory
Reading
Homework
Project Preparation
Thesis Preparation
Peer Education
Seminar
Technical Visit
Course Conference
Brain Storming
Questions Answers
Individual and Group Work
Role Playing-Animation-Improvisation
Active Participation in Class

Assessment & Evaluation Methods of the Course

(All assessment and evaluation methods used at the university are managed systematically. Upon proposals of the programme units, they are assessed by the relevant academic boards and, if found appropriate, they are included among the university list. Programmes, then, choose the appropriate methods in line with their programme design from this list. Likewise, appropriate methods to be used for the course units can be chosen among those defined for the programme.)

Aassessment and evaluation Methods defined at the Programme Level	Assessment and Evaluation Methods defined for the Course
Midterm
Presentation
Final Exam
Quiz
Report Evaluation
Homework Evaluation
Oral Exam
Thesis Defense
Jury Evaluation
Practice Exam
Evaluation of Implementation Training in the Workplace
Active Participation in Class
Participation in Discussions

Relationship Between CLOs & Teaching-Learning, Assesment-Evaluation Methods of the Course

(The matrix below shows the teaching-learning and assessment-evaluation methods designated for the course unit in relation to the course learning outcomes.)

Contribution of Assesment & Evalution Activities to Final Grade of the Course

Measurement and Evaluation Methods	# of practice per semester	Level of Contribution
Presentation	2	% 20.00
Midterms	1	% 30.00
Semester Final Exam	1	% 50.00
Total		% 100
PERCENTAGE OF SEMESTER WORK		% 50
PERCENTAGE OF FINAL WORK		% 50
Total		% 100

SECTION V: WORKLOAD & ECTS CREDITS ALLOCATED FOR THE COURSE

WORKLOAD OF TEACHING & LEARNING ACTIVITIES
Teaching & Learning Activities	# of Activities per semester	Duration (hour)	Total Workload
Course	14	3	42
Laboratory	0	0	0
Application	0	0	0
Special Course Internship (Work Placement)	0	0	0
Field Work	0	0	0
Study Hours Out of Class	0	0	0
Presentations / Seminar	0	0	0
Project	0	0	0
Homework Assignments	0	0	0
Total Workload of Teaching & Learning Activities	-	-	42
WORKLOAD OF ASSESMENT & EVALUATION ACTIVITIES
Assesment & Evaluation Activities	# of Activities per semester	Duration (hour)	Total Workload
Quizzes	0	0	0
Midterms	1	10	10
Semester Final Exam	1	20	20
Total Workload of Assesment & Evaluation Activities	-	-	30
TOTAL WORKLOAD (Teaching & Learning + Assesment & Evaluation Activities)			72
ECTS CREDITS OF THE COURSE (Total Workload/25.5 h)			3