SECTION I: GENERAL INFORMATION ABOUT THE COURSE |
Course Code | Course Name | Year | Semester | Theoretical | Practical | Credit | ECTS |
60731METOS-MIM0336 | Digital Design in Architecture | 4 | Fall | 2 | 2 | 3 | 5 |
Course Type : | Elective Course V |
Cycle: | Bachelor TQF-HE:6. Master`s Degree QF-EHEA:First Cycle EQF-LLL:6. Master`s Degree |
Language of Instruction: | Turkish |
Prerequisities and Co-requisities: | N/A |
Mode of Delivery: | E-Learning |
Name of Coordinator: | Instructor AYŞEGÜL ÇELTEKLİGİL |
Dersin Öğretim Eleman(lar)ı: | |
Dersin Kategorisi: |
SECTION II: INTRODUCTION TO THE COURSE |
Course Objectives: | |
Course Content: |
Knowledge (Described as Theoritical and/or Factual Knowledge.) | ||
1) 1) Mimari tasarımda çağdaş tasarım yaklaşımları hakkında gerekli bilgiye sahiptir.
|
||
Skills (Describe as Cognitive and/or Practical Skills.) | ||
1) 1) Öğrencinin verilen kavramlar ile tasarım arasındaki ilişkileri kurmadaki yaratıcılığı;
2) Öğrencinin yenilikçi ortamları tasarıma aktarabilmesi;
3) Öğrencinin, sayısal tasarım kavramlarını, ön tasarım ve tasarım süreçlerinde eş zamanlı
kullanabilmeleri ;
4) Öğrencinin çağdaş mimari ifade tekniklerini rafine olarak kullanması;
5) Sayısal tasarım araçlarını ve yöntemlerini kullanarak, esnek-özgürlükçü yaklaşımların
kazanılması;
|
||
Competences (Described as "Ability of the learner to apply knowledge and skills autonomously with responsibility", "Learning to learn"," Communication and social" and "Field specific" competences.) | ||
1) 1) Bilişim teknolojileri sonrası mekan üretimi hakkında bilgi sahibi olmak
2) Mimarlıkta sayısal tasarım hakkında bilgi sahibi olmak
3) Mimari tasarım sürecinde kullanılabilecek etkileşim araç ve ortamları konusunda bilgi
sahibi olmak.
4) Mimari tasarımda yeni araçlar ve açılımlar hakkında bilgi sahibi olmak
5) Mimari tasarımı destekleyen sayısal ve fiziksel artefektlerin arasındaki etkileşimin mantığı
hakkında bilgi sahibi olmak.
6) Mimaride çağdaş kavramlar hakkında ( veri kullanımı, hesaplamalı tasarım, parametrik
tasarım, fraktal, parazit ) bilgi sahibi olmak
|
Week | Subject | ||
Related Preparation | Further Study | ||
1) | |||
2) | |||
3) | |||
4) | |||
5) | |||
6) | |||
7) | |||
8) | |||
9) | |||
10) | |||
11) | |||
12) | |||
13) | |||
14) |
Course Notes / Textbooks: | Akın, Ö., (1997), “The Computer as a Catalyst for new Educational Paradigms in Architecture”, Mimarlık, ODTÜ Journal of Faculty of Architecture, Bahar 1997, Ankara. Akın, Ö., (2002), “Case-based Instruction Strategies in Architecture”, Design Studies, 23:407-431, Elsevier Science Ltd. Akın, Ö. ve Özkaya, İ., (2005), “Mixing Domains: Architecture Plus Software Engineering”, Education and Research in Computer-Aided Architectural Design in Europe, eCAADe 23. Lisbon Conference Proceedings, sf.27-35, J.P. Duarte (derl.), Digital Design: The Quest for New Paradigms, Session 1: Collaborative Design and Learning, Portekiz. Augenbroe, G., Eastman, C., (1999), Computers in Building, Kluwer Academic Publ. U.S.A. Bongers, B. (2006). Interaction with our electronic environment an e-cological approach to physical interface design,Cahier Book series (no 34) of the Faculty of Journalism and Communication, Hogeschool van Utrecht, April 2004 ISBN 90-77575-02-2. Bovill, C., (1996), Fractal Geometry in Architecture and Design, Birkhauser, Boston. Cooper, J. Watkinson, D., Oskrochi, R. 2010. Fractal analysis and perception of visual quality in everyday street vistas. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, pp. 808-822. Coyne, R.D., Rosenman, M.A., Radford, A.D., Balachandran, M., Gero, J.S., (1990), Knowledge-Based Design Systems U.S.A: Addison-Wesley. Ediz, Ö. (2003) Mimari Tasarımda Fraktal Kurguya Dayalı Üretken Bir Yaklaşım. Doktora Tezi, İTÜ Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Mimarlık Anabilim Dalı, İstanbul. Gero, J.S., Maher, M.L. (eds.), (1993), Modeling Creativity and Knowledge-Based Creative Design, NewJersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Ass. Publ. Jabi, W., (Ed.) (2001), Reinventing the Discourse: How Digital Tools Help Bridge and Transform Research, Education and Practice in Architecture, ACADIA2001, NewYork. . Kafai, Y., Resnick, M., (eds) (1996), Designing Thinking and Learning in a igital World, Lawrence Erlbaum, New Jersey. . Kolodner, J., (1993), Case Based Reasoning, Morgan Kaufmann Publ., San Mateo, CA. Lawson, B., (1991), How Designers Think, Oxford: Butterworth. . Maher, M.L., Pu, P., (1997), Issues and Applications of Case-Based Reasoning in Design, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publ., New Jersey. Mitchell, W.J., (1990), The Logic of Architecture, Design, Computation and Cognition, Massachusetts: The MIT Press. Paul Dourish. (2004). Where the action is: the foundations of embodied interaction. MIT press. Picon, A. (2010). Digital culture in architecture. Birkh user Architecture. Pohl, J., (ed) (1997), Advances in Collaborative Design and Decision Support Systems, InterSymp-97, Germany. Russell, S., Norvig, P., (2009), Artificial Intelligence: A Modern Approach, Prentice Hall Inc., New Jersey. |
References: |
SECTION III: RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN COURSE UNIT AND COURSE LEARNING OUTCOMES (CLOs) |
CLOs/PLOs | KPLO 1 | KPLO 2 | KPLO 3 | KPLO 4 | KPLO 5 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | |
CLO1 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
CLO2 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
CLO3 |
No Effect | 1 Lowest | 2 Low | 3 Average | 4 High | 5 Highest |
SECTION IV: TEACHING-LEARNING & ASSESMENT-EVALUATION METHODS OF THE COURSE |
Lectures | |
Discussion | |
Case Study | |
Problem Solving | |
Demonstration | |
Views | |
Laboratory | |
Reading | |
Homework | |
Project Preparation | |
Thesis Preparation | |
Peer Education | |
Seminar | |
Technical Visit | |
Course Conference | |
Brain Storming | |
Questions Answers | |
Individual and Group Work | |
Role Playing-Animation-Improvisation | |
Active Participation in Class |
Midterm | |
Presentation | |
Final Exam | |
Quiz | |
Report Evaluation | |
Homework Evaluation | |
Oral Exam | |
Thesis Defense | |
Jury Evaluation | |
Practice Exam | |
Evaluation of Implementation Training in the Workplace | |
Active Participation in Class | |
Participation in Discussions |
LEARNING & TEACHING METHODS | ASSESMENT & EVALUATION METHODS | ||||||||||||||||||||
CLO1 | CLO2 | CLO3 | |||||||||||||||||||
-Lectures | -Midterm | ||||||||||||||||||||
-Discussion | -Presentation | ||||||||||||||||||||
-Case Study | -Final Exam | ||||||||||||||||||||
-Problem Solving | -Quiz | ||||||||||||||||||||
-Demonstration | -Report Evaluation | ||||||||||||||||||||
-Views | -Homework Evaluation | ||||||||||||||||||||
-Laboratory | -Oral Exam | ||||||||||||||||||||
-Reading | -Thesis Defense | ||||||||||||||||||||
-Homework | -Jury Evaluation | ||||||||||||||||||||
-Project Preparation | -Practice Exam | ||||||||||||||||||||
-Thesis Preparation | -Evaluation of Implementation Training in the Workplace | ||||||||||||||||||||
-Peer Education | -Active Participation in Class | ||||||||||||||||||||
-Seminar | - Participation in Discussions | ||||||||||||||||||||
-Technical Visit | |||||||||||||||||||||
-Course Conference | |||||||||||||||||||||
-Brain Storming | |||||||||||||||||||||
-Questions Answers | |||||||||||||||||||||
-Individual and Group Work | |||||||||||||||||||||
-Role Playing-Animation-Improvisation | |||||||||||||||||||||
-Active Participation in Class |
Measurement and Evaluation Methods | # of practice per semester | Level of Contribution |
Application | 4 | % 20.00 |
Midterms | 1 | % 20.00 |
Semester Final Exam | 1 | % 50.00 |
Active Participation in Class | 1 | % 10.00 |
Total | % 100 | |
PERCENTAGE OF SEMESTER WORK | % 50 | |
PERCENTAGE OF FINAL WORK | % 50 | |
Total | % 100 |
SECTION V: WORKLOAD & ECTS CREDITS ALLOCATED FOR THE COURSE |
WORKLOAD OF TEACHING & LEARNING ACTIVITIES | |||
Teaching & Learning Activities | # of Activities per semester | Duration (hour) | Total Workload |
Course | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Laboratory | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Application | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Special Course Internship (Work Placement) | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Field Work | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Study Hours Out of Class | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Presentations / Seminar | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Project | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Homework Assignments | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Total Workload of Teaching & Learning Activities | - | - | 0 |
WORKLOAD OF ASSESMENT & EVALUATION ACTIVITIES | |||
Assesment & Evaluation Activities | # of Activities per semester | Duration (hour) | Total Workload |
Quizzes | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Midterms | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Semester Final Exam | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Total Workload of Assesment & Evaluation Activities | - | - | 0 |
TOTAL WORKLOAD (Teaching & Learning + Assesment & Evaluation Activities) | 0 | ||
ECTS CREDITS OF THE COURSE (Total Workload/25.5 h) | 5 |