SECTION I: GENERAL INFORMATION ABOUT THE COURSE |
Course Code | Course Name | Year | Semester | Theoretical | Practical | Credit | ECTS |
60731METOZ-MIM0196 | Urban Planning and Design | 3 | Spring | 2 | 2 | 3 | 4 |
Course Type : | Compulsory |
Cycle: | Bachelor TQF-HE:6. Master`s Degree QF-EHEA:First Cycle EQF-LLL:6. Master`s Degree |
Language of Instruction: | Turkish |
Prerequisities and Co-requisities: | N/A |
Mode of Delivery: | Face to face |
Name of Coordinator: | Instructor CEREN KAHRAMAN BEREKET |
Dersin Öğretim Eleman(lar)ı: | |
Dersin Kategorisi: | Programme Specific |
SECTION II: INTRODUCTION TO THE COURSE |
Course Objectives: | This course aims to furnish the students with awareness and a real understanding of the relationship of architectural design to larger contexts of urban design and city planning. The goal is to develop their competency of thinking in terms of a larger design structure. |
Course Content: | Definition and evaluation of the city, its development and components including activities, functions, movement channels and corresponding physical forms; historical background of city planning and urban design, land-use plan, transportation plan, planning in different scales, visual analysis of the city, administrative aspects. This course employs the project-based learning approach. In this respect aside from the conventional content the course has a project-based learning component. The project based-learning component aims realising one or more projects designed for learning purposes involving the development of certain intermediary and final deliverables in a step-by-step mannerby the students individually or in project teams. The evaluation of the project-based learning component involves grading the project deliverables and the project works by the instructor and/or a jury. |
Knowledge (Described as Theoritical and/or Factual Knowledge.) | ||
1) Knows the social and historical processes that play a role in shaping the urban space.
|
||
2) Comprehends the different approaches of urban planning and urban design with an architectural perspective.
|
||
Skills (Describe as Cognitive and/or Practical Skills.) | ||
1) Relates the principles of urban planning and urban design with architectural design processes.
|
||
Competences (Described as "Ability of the learner to apply knowledge and skills autonomously with responsibility", "Learning to learn"," Communication and social" and "Field specific" competences.) |
Week | Subject | ||
Related Preparation | Further Study | ||
1) | Introduction to basic concepts and principles of city planning and urban design | Worksheet | |
2) | Elements of urban built environment, urban spaces, urban systems; Assignment of projects | Related documents, presentations, discussions | |
3) | Physical form of cities, urban elements-urban physical form relations; Take Home Examination I | Related documents, presentations, discussions; Assignment 01 | |
4) | Development of cities in history | Related documents, presentations, discussions | |
5) | Spatial organizations, urban planning-urban design relations | Related documents, presentations, discussions | |
6) | Urbanization process in Turkey; | Related documents, presentations, discussions | |
7) | City planning and urban design in Turkey | Related documents, presentations, discussions | |
8) | midterm exam, projects Submission of the first delivery of the project | ||
9) | Elements of urban identity and urban memory | Related documents, presentations, discussions | |
10) | Principles of urban public space design; Take Home Examination II | Assignment 02 | |
11) | Principles of urban public space design | Related documents, presentations, discussions | |
12) | Presentations and discussions on planning and design manuals; | Related documents, presentations, discussions | |
13) | Case-study analysis | Related documents, presentations, discussions | |
14) | Submission of the final delivery of the project and presentation | - |
Course Notes / Textbooks: | Keleş, R., 2000; Kentleşme Politikaları, 2000, İmge Yayınları, Ankara. Aydemir, S., Aydemir, S., Öksüz, A., M., Özyaba, M., Sancar, C., Beyazlı, D., Ş., Türk, Y., A., 2004; Kentsel Alanların Planlanması ve Tasarımı, Akademi Yayınevi, Trabzon. Kartal, K., 1992; Türkiye'de Kentleşme, Adim Yay., İstanbul. Benevelo, L., 1995; Avrupa Tarihinde Kentler, Afa Yay., Istanbul. Lynch, K. The Image of the City. The MIT Press, Cambridge MA: 1960. Bacon, E. N. (1995). Design of Cities. Thames and Hudson. American Planning Association. Planning and Urban Design Standards. John & Wiley: 2006. Barnett, J. City Design. Routledge. 2011. Brown, L. J., Dixon, D., Gillham, O. Urban design for an urban century: placemaking for people. Wiley, 2009. Lang, J. (2005) Urban Design: A Typology of Procedures and Products, UK: Architectural Press. Lévyy, J. (ed.). The City: Critical Essays in Human Geography. Aldershot: Ashgate, 2008. Krieger, A., Saunders, W. S.(eds). Urban Design. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 2009. Moughtin, C. (1999) Urban Design Method and Techniques, UK: Architectural Press. Moughtin, C. and Shirley, P. (2005) Urban Design Green Dimensions, UK: Architectural Press. Parker, S. (2004). Urban Theory and the Urban Experience. Taylor and Francis Group. William J. V. Neill. Urban planning and cultural identity. Routledge: 2010. |
References: | Nesbitt, K. (ed.). Theorizing a New Agenda for Architecture. Princeton Press: 1996. Heath, K. Vernacular Architecture and Regional Design. Architectural Press: 2009. |
SECTION III: RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN COURSE UNIT AND COURSE LEARNING OUTCOMES (CLOs) |
CLOs/PLOs | KPLO 1 | KPLO 2 | KPLO 3 | KPLO 4 | KPLO 5 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | |
CLO1 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
CLO2 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
CLO3 |
No Effect | 1 Lowest | 2 Low | 3 Average | 4 High | 5 Highest |
SECTION IV: TEACHING-LEARNING & ASSESMENT-EVALUATION METHODS OF THE COURSE |
Lectures | |
Discussion | |
Case Study | |
Problem Solving | |
Demonstration | |
Views | |
Laboratory | |
Reading | |
Homework | |
Project Preparation | |
Thesis Preparation | |
Peer Education | |
Seminar | |
Technical Visit | |
Course Conference | |
Brain Storming | |
Questions Answers | |
Individual and Group Work | |
Role Playing-Animation-Improvisation | |
Active Participation in Class |
Midterm | |
Presentation | |
Final Exam | |
Quiz | |
Report Evaluation | |
Homework Evaluation | |
Oral Exam | |
Thesis Defense | |
Jury Evaluation | |
Practice Exam | |
Evaluation of Implementation Training in the Workplace | |
Active Participation in Class | |
Participation in Discussions |
LEARNING & TEACHING METHODS | ASSESMENT & EVALUATION METHODS | ||||||||||||||||||||
CLO1 | CLO2 | CLO3 | |||||||||||||||||||
-Lectures | -Midterm | ||||||||||||||||||||
-Discussion | -Presentation | ||||||||||||||||||||
-Case Study | -Final Exam | ||||||||||||||||||||
-Problem Solving | -Quiz | ||||||||||||||||||||
-Demonstration | -Report Evaluation | ||||||||||||||||||||
-Views | -Homework Evaluation | ||||||||||||||||||||
-Laboratory | -Oral Exam | ||||||||||||||||||||
-Reading | -Thesis Defense | ||||||||||||||||||||
-Homework | -Jury Evaluation | ||||||||||||||||||||
-Project Preparation | -Practice Exam | ||||||||||||||||||||
-Thesis Preparation | -Evaluation of Implementation Training in the Workplace | ||||||||||||||||||||
-Peer Education | -Active Participation in Class | ||||||||||||||||||||
-Seminar | - Participation in Discussions | ||||||||||||||||||||
-Technical Visit | |||||||||||||||||||||
-Course Conference | |||||||||||||||||||||
-Brain Storming | |||||||||||||||||||||
-Questions Answers | |||||||||||||||||||||
-Individual and Group Work | |||||||||||||||||||||
-Role Playing-Animation-Improvisation | |||||||||||||||||||||
-Active Participation in Class |
Measurement and Evaluation Methods | # of practice per semester | Level of Contribution |
Homework Assignments | 1 | % 10.00 |
Project | 1 | % 15.00 |
Midterms | 1 | % 25.00 |
Semester Final Exam | 1 | % 50.00 |
Total | % 100 | |
PERCENTAGE OF SEMESTER WORK | % 50 | |
PERCENTAGE OF FINAL WORK | % 50 | |
Total | % 100 |
SECTION V: WORKLOAD & ECTS CREDITS ALLOCATED FOR THE COURSE |
WORKLOAD OF TEACHING & LEARNING ACTIVITIES | |||
Teaching & Learning Activities | # of Activities per semester | Duration (hour) | Total Workload |
Course | 14 | 2 | 28 |
Laboratory | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Application | 14 | 2 | 28 |
Special Course Internship (Work Placement) | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Field Work | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Study Hours Out of Class | 14 | 2 | 28 |
Presentations / Seminar | 4 | 1 | 4 |
Project | 4 | 5 | 20 |
Homework Assignments | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Total Workload of Teaching & Learning Activities | - | - | 108 |
WORKLOAD OF ASSESMENT & EVALUATION ACTIVITIES | |||
Assesment & Evaluation Activities | # of Activities per semester | Duration (hour) | Total Workload |
Quizzes | 3 | 2 | 6 |
Midterms | 1 | 6 | 6 |
Semester Final Exam | 1 | 12 | 12 |
Total Workload of Assesment & Evaluation Activities | - | - | 24 |
TOTAL WORKLOAD (Teaching & Learning + Assesment & Evaluation Activities) | 132 | ||
ECTS CREDITS OF THE COURSE (Total Workload/25.5 h) | 4 |