SECTION I: GENERAL INFORMATION ABOUT THE COURSE |
Course Code | Course Name | Year | Semester | Theoretical | Practical | Credit | ECTS |
60731METOS-MIM0367 | Contemporary Turkish Achitecture | 4 | Fall | 2 | 2 | 3 | 5 |
Course Type : | Elective Course II |
Cycle: | Bachelor TQF-HE:6. Master`s Degree QF-EHEA:First Cycle EQF-LLL:6. Master`s Degree |
Language of Instruction: | Turkish |
Prerequisities and Co-requisities: | N/A |
Mode of Delivery: | Face to face |
Name of Coordinator: | |
Dersin Öğretim Eleman(lar)ı: |
Instructor STAFF |
Dersin Kategorisi: | Programme Specific |
SECTION II: INTRODUCTION TO THE COURSE |
Course Objectives: | |
Course Content: |
Knowledge (Described as Theoritical and/or Factual Knowledge.) | ||
1) Bilgi (Kuramsal ve/veya olgusal bilgi olarak tanımlanmıştır.) |
||
Skills (Describe as Cognitive and/or Practical Skills.) | ||
1) Beceriler (Bilişsel ve/veya uygulama becerileri olarak tanımlanmıştır.)
• Çağdaş mimarlığın gelişimini anlayacak ve değerlendirebilecektir.
• Güncel mimarlık sorunları ve olanaklarının farkına varabilecektir.
• Türkiye’de mevcut Çağdaş mimarlık sorunları ve tartışmaları hakkında bilgi sahibi olacaktır.
Yetkinlikler ("Bağımsız Çalışabilme", "Sorumluluk Alabilme", "Öğrenme", "İletişim ve Sosyal" ve "Alana Özgü" yetkinlikler olarak tanımlanmıştır.) |
||
Competences (Described as "Ability of the learner to apply knowledge and skills autonomously with responsibility", "Learning to learn"," Communication and social" and "Field specific" competences.) |
Week | Subject | ||
Related Preparation | Further Study | ||
1) | |||
2) | |||
3) | |||
4) | |||
5) | |||
6) | |||
7) | |||
8) | |||
9) | |||
10) | |||
11) | |||
12) | |||
13) | |||
14) | |||
15) |
Course Notes / Textbooks: | 1. Le Corbusier, Towards an architecture, Paris 1923. 2. Gropius, W.,The New Architecture and The Bauhaus, 1935. 3. Rossi, A., The Architecture of the City, Milano, 1966. 4. Venturi, R., Izenour, S., Scott-Brown, D., Learning from Las Vegas, MIT Press 1970. 5. Koolhaas, R., Mau, B., SMLXL, 010 Rotterdam, 1995. 6. . Bir Mimarlığa Doğru, Le Corbusier, Yapı Kredi Yayınları,2013, Çeviren: Serpil Merzi Özaloğlu. 7. Sözen, M. - Tapan, M., 50 Yılın Türk Mimarisi, İstanbul, 1973. 8. Aslanoğlu, İ., Erken Cumhuriyet Dönemi Mimarlığı, Ankara 1980. 9. Yavuz, Y., Birinci Ulusal Mimarlık Dönemi ve Mimar A. Kemalettin Bey, Ankara, 1981. 10. Sözen, M., Cumhuriyet Dönemi Türk Mimarlığı, Ankara, 1984. 11. Batur, A., M. Vedat Tek Kimliğinin İzinde Bir Mimar, İstanbul 2003. 12. Bozdoğan, S., Modernizm ve Ulusun İnşaası - Erken Cumhuriyet Türkiyesi’nde Mimari Kültür, İstanbul, 2008. |
References: | 1. Le Corbusier, Towards an architecture, Paris 1923. 2. Gropius, W.,The New Architecture and The Bauhaus, 1935. 3. Rossi, A., The Architecture of the City, Milano, 1966. 4. Venturi, R., Izenour, S., Scott-Brown, D., Learning from Las Vegas, MIT Press 1970. 5. Koolhaas, R., Mau, B., SMLXL, 010 Rotterdam, 1995. 6. . Bir Mimarlığa Doğru, Le Corbusier, Yapı Kredi Yayınları,2013, Çeviren: Serpil Merzi Özaloğlu. 7. Sözen, M. - Tapan, M., 50 Yılın Türk Mimarisi, İstanbul, 1973. 8. Aslanoğlu, İ., Erken Cumhuriyet Dönemi Mimarlığı, Ankara 1980. 9. Yavuz, Y., Birinci Ulusal Mimarlık Dönemi ve Mimar A. Kemalettin Bey, Ankara, 1981. 10. Sözen, M., Cumhuriyet Dönemi Türk Mimarlığı, Ankara, 1984. 11. Batur, A., M. Vedat Tek Kimliğinin İzinde Bir Mimar, İstanbul 2003. 12. Bozdoğan, S., Modernizm ve Ulusun İnşaası - Erken Cumhuriyet Türkiyesi’nde Mimari Kültür, İstanbul, 2008. |
SECTION III: RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN COURSE UNIT AND COURSE LEARNING OUTCOMES (CLOs) |
CLOs/PLOs | KPLO 1 | KPLO 2 | KPLO 3 | KPLO 4 | KPLO 5 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | |
CLO1 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
CLO2 |
No Effect | 1 Lowest | 2 Low | 3 Average | 4 High | 5 Highest |
SECTION IV: TEACHING-LEARNING & ASSESMENT-EVALUATION METHODS OF THE COURSE |
Lectures | |
Discussion | |
Case Study | |
Problem Solving | |
Demonstration | |
Views | |
Laboratory | |
Reading | |
Homework | |
Project Preparation | |
Thesis Preparation | |
Peer Education | |
Seminar | |
Technical Visit | |
Course Conference | |
Brain Storming | |
Questions Answers | |
Individual and Group Work | |
Role Playing-Animation-Improvisation | |
Active Participation in Class |
Midterm | |
Presentation | |
Final Exam | |
Quiz | |
Report Evaluation | |
Homework Evaluation | |
Oral Exam | |
Thesis Defense | |
Jury Evaluation | |
Practice Exam | |
Evaluation of Implementation Training in the Workplace | |
Active Participation in Class | |
Participation in Discussions |
LEARNING & TEACHING METHODS | ASSESMENT & EVALUATION METHODS | ||||||||||||||||||||
CLO1 | CLO2 | ||||||||||||||||||||
-Lectures | -Midterm | ||||||||||||||||||||
-Discussion | -Presentation | ||||||||||||||||||||
-Case Study | -Final Exam | ||||||||||||||||||||
-Problem Solving | -Quiz | ||||||||||||||||||||
-Demonstration | -Report Evaluation | ||||||||||||||||||||
-Views | -Homework Evaluation | ||||||||||||||||||||
-Laboratory | -Oral Exam | ||||||||||||||||||||
-Reading | -Thesis Defense | ||||||||||||||||||||
-Homework | -Jury Evaluation | ||||||||||||||||||||
-Project Preparation | -Practice Exam | ||||||||||||||||||||
-Thesis Preparation | -Evaluation of Implementation Training in the Workplace | ||||||||||||||||||||
-Peer Education | -Active Participation in Class | ||||||||||||||||||||
-Seminar | - Participation in Discussions | ||||||||||||||||||||
-Technical Visit | |||||||||||||||||||||
-Course Conference | |||||||||||||||||||||
-Brain Storming | |||||||||||||||||||||
-Questions Answers | |||||||||||||||||||||
-Individual and Group Work | |||||||||||||||||||||
-Role Playing-Animation-Improvisation | |||||||||||||||||||||
-Active Participation in Class |
Measurement and Evaluation Methods | # of practice per semester | Level of Contribution |
Presentation | 1 | % 10.00 |
Project | 1 | % 20.00 |
Midterms | 1 | % 20.00 |
Semester Final Exam | 1 | % 50.00 |
Total | % 100 | |
PERCENTAGE OF SEMESTER WORK | % 50 | |
PERCENTAGE OF FINAL WORK | % 50 | |
Total | % 100 |
SECTION V: WORKLOAD & ECTS CREDITS ALLOCATED FOR THE COURSE |
WORKLOAD OF TEACHING & LEARNING ACTIVITIES | |||
Teaching & Learning Activities | # of Activities per semester | Duration (hour) | Total Workload |
Course | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Laboratory | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Application | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Special Course Internship (Work Placement) | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Field Work | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Study Hours Out of Class | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Presentations / Seminar | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Project | 2 | 0 | 0 |
Homework Assignments | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Total Workload of Teaching & Learning Activities | - | - | 0 |
WORKLOAD OF ASSESMENT & EVALUATION ACTIVITIES | |||
Assesment & Evaluation Activities | # of Activities per semester | Duration (hour) | Total Workload |
Quizzes | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Midterms | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Semester Final Exam | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Total Workload of Assesment & Evaluation Activities | - | - | 0 |
TOTAL WORKLOAD (Teaching & Learning + Assesment & Evaluation Activities) | 0 | ||
ECTS CREDITS OF THE COURSE (Total Workload/25.5 h) | 5 |